Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis Eugene W. Holland
Publisher: Routledge

Further, Seem writes [of Deleuze and Guattari's schizoanalysis]: [“Introduction,” Anti-Oedipus, p. €Introduction to schizoanalysis”: Deleuze and Guattari outline a practical ethics of schizoanalysis, promulgating the use-value of a malevolently destructive desire that purifies as does a curettage. A week later, Anthony formerly opened his book-event on The Hermetic Deleuze [here], and formerly shared the pdf of Joshua's introduction The Secrets of Immanence [here], which I downloaded and printed in order to read it. Deleuze had heard of Guattari, and he pursued him in a sense. (Via Continental Philosophy) A number of texts on Deleuze and by Deleuze/Deleuze-Guattari are now available online through Fark Yaralari's blog. Deleuze and Guattari derived two basic principles from their analysis of schizophrenia and its importance for philosophy: they called these the “molar” and the “molecular”. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis Eugene W. The dissolution of the subject and its implications for society is the theme of Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, which Deleuze published with Félix Guattari in 1972 (English 1983). Holland 1999 Routledge ISBN10:0415113199;ISBN13:9780415113199. All but one come from the fourth section “Introducing Schizoanalysis;” if it was not the most elucidating section, I certainly thought it was the most fun. And a couple of years later they come out with a text called Anti-Oedipus. So say Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in their introduction to Anti-Oedipus (1972), the first volume of their Capitalism and Schizophrenia series. McKenzie Wark makes While the term “schizoanalysis” is derived from “schizophrenia” (as discussed by Deleuze and Guattari), it does not promote mental illness; rather, “schizo” is used as a way of offering up the possibility of multiple voices, and alternative world-views, amongst other factors. Deleuze and Guattari's Anti-Oedipus: Introduction to Schizoanalysis. The book, in large part, is written against A radical critique of capital cannot therefore be accomplished by psychoanalysis, but requires a schizoanalysis “to overturn the theater of representation into the order of desiring-production” (Deleuze 1983b, 271). Of special interest to me is Christian Kerslake's Deleuze About Freud as deterritorialising desire from need (analogously to Luther and Adam Smith) Yes, Eugene Holland makes a convincing case for reading Anti-Oedipus on this basis in his Introduction to Schizoanalysis. They meet in 1969, they start writing, thinking, brainstorming.